Abstract
The concept of manoeuvre, now a central aspect of British’ Defence Doctrine, has attracted and continues to attract much controversy. In this article Major General Kiszely analyses the reasons for this, examining what exactly is meant by the term manoeuvre, and explaining why the concept is not well understood. He discusses the relationship between manoeuvre and attrition, traces the origins of the terms ‘manoeuvre warfare’ and ‘the manoeuvrist approach’, and gives an account of the debate—articularly lively in the US—which has surrounded the subject. Major General Kiszely then turns to assess the validity of the manoeuvrist approach across the whole spectrum of military operations from warfighting to peacekeeping and, lastly, asks whether such an approach is universally applicable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.