Abstract
The various steps involved in experimental investigations of the causes of observed ecological patterns are examined. A sequence of different steps (observation, model, hypothesis, null hypothesis, test) is identifiable. The logical necessity for distinguishing and evaluating each of these steps is discussed. The potential usefulness of explicit recognition of the logical relationships between the various parts of the procedure is evaluated by reference to experimental studies to determine the causes of boundaries of vertical distribution of macro-algae in rocky intertidal habitats. Pitfalls of experimental procedures can sometimes be recognized as failures in the logical progress from one part to the next in the sequence of steps necessary in any study. Particularly important is the early recognition of the existence of many, potentially conflicting, but sometimes interactive, models to account for any observed pattern. Greater attention to the relation-ships between the components of the logical structure of an experimental study might aid in reduction of errors in the design, analysis and interpretation of ecological experimental data.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call