Abstract
To date, single neuron recordings remain the gold standard for monitoring the activity of neuronal populations. Since obtaining single neuron recordings is not always possible, high frequency or ‘multiunit activity’ (MUA) is often used as a surrogate. Although MUA recordings allow one to monitor the activity of a large number of neurons, they do not allow identification of specific neuronal subtypes, the knowledge of which is often critical for understanding electrophysiological processes. Here, we explored whether prior knowledge of the single unit waveform of specific neuron types is sufficient to permit the use of MUA to monitor and distinguish differential activity of individual neuron types. We used an experimental and modeling approach to determine if components of the MUA can monitor medium spiny neurons (MSNs) and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs) in the mouse dorsal striatum. We demonstrate that when well-isolated spikes are recorded, the MUA at frequencies greater than 100Hz is correlated with single unit spiking, highly dependent on the waveform of each neuron type, and accurately reflects the timing and spectral signature of each neuron. However, in the absence of well-isolated spikes (the norm in most MUA recordings), the MUA did not typically contain sufficient information to permit accurate prediction of the respective population activity of MSNs and FSIs. Thus, even under ideal conditions for the MUA to reliably predict the moment-to-moment activity of specific local neuronal ensembles, knowledge of the spike waveform of the underlying neuronal populations is necessary, but not sufficient.
Highlights
The ability to simultaneously monitor the activity of multiple neuronal populations is of critical importance
In this study we tested the efficacy of high frequency activity in extracellular recordings to predict the spiking activity of specific neuronal subtypes
We demonstrate the following: 1. in the presence of a well-isolated spike, high frequency activity in the upper LFP and multiunit activity’ (MUA) range accurately detected and characterized the spiking of neuronal subtypes based on the action potential’s spectral signature, where spikes with broad action potentials exhibited more power in frequencies below 2KHz compared to spikes with narrow action potentials
Summary
The ability to simultaneously monitor the activity of multiple neuronal populations is of critical importance. Noninvasive techniques such as recordings from scalp EEG electrodes provide an overview of neuronal activity but fail to identify specific types of neurons, but more invasive approaches using microelectrodes can provide additional information. MUA can sometimes be analyzed further to isolate the activity of single neurons whose spiking provide a fundamental measure of brain function. There are many situations when microelectrode recordings do not permit isolation of the activity of single neurons. Gathering MUA without information from well-isolated spikes is common when chronic microelectrode recordings are performed in non-human primates [1,2,3,4,5] or in patients with tetraplegia [6, 7]. Even when single neuron recordings are feasible, oftentimes information about the population as a whole cannot be generalized from the recording of one or a few neurons
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have