Abstract

There is little knowledge regarding the environmental sustainability of domestic on-site or decentralised wastewater treatment systems (DWWTS). This study evaluated six unique life cycle environmental impacts for different DWTTS configurations of five conventional septic tank systems, four packaged treatment units, and a willow evapotranspiration system. Similar freshwater eutrophication (FE), dissipated water (DW), and mineral and metal (MM), burdens were noted between the packaged and conventional system configurations, with the packaged systems demonstrating significantly higher impacts of between 18% and 56% for climate change (CC), marine eutrophication (ME), and fossils (F). At a system level, higher impacts were observed in systems requiring (i) three vs. two engineered treatment stages, (ii) a larger soil percolation trench area, and (iii) pumping of effluent. The evapotranspiration system presented the smallest total environmental impacts (3.0–10.8 lower), with net benefits for FE, ME, and MM identified due to the biomass (wood) production offsetting these burdens. Further analysis highlighted the sensitivity of results to biomass yield, operational demands (desludging or pumping energy demands), and embodied materials, with less significant impacts for replacing mechanical components, i.e., pumps. The findings highlighted the variation in environmental performance of different DWTTS configurations and indicated opportunities for design improvements to reduce their life cycle impacts.

Highlights

  • The results demonstrate the variability in results across the different environmental burden categories considered for each decentralised treatment system over their 30-year operational lifespan

  • The treatment system configurations involving septic tanks (a–e) compared to packaged treatment systems (f–i) presented mixed results, which made both sets of decentralised wastewater treatment systems (DWWTS) difficult to distinguish across these categories

  • The environmental burdens attributed to different conventional and packaged DWWTSs vary across the range of impact categories assessed based on the configuration of primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The treatment of wastewater is a vital process for environmental protection and returning treated effluent to the water cycle [1], as well as for the protection of public health. The energy demands associated with wastewater treatment systems (WWTSs) represent. 1% of total global electricity, or 25% of overall water and wastewater energy demands [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call