Abstract

The recycling of restaurant food waste can bring environmental benefits and improve food safety for urban residents. We here assessed the entire life cycle of the anaerobic digestion–aerobic composting technique of restaurant food waste recycling using Lanzhou as a case study. We used the CML2001 method provided with the Gabi software and compared the results to those produced using the traditional treatment techniques (landfill and incineration). This work includes a sensitivity analysis of the results. It is here concluded that the anaerobic digestion–aerobic composting technique had the smallest environmental impact of the methods here examined. The life cycle of anaerobic digestion–aerobic composting primarily consumes water, clay, coal, crude oil, and natural gas. The pre-processing phase consumes the most resources, and anaerobic digestion showed the greatest environmental impact. Specific environmental impacts in order from the highest to lowest potential to exacerbate global warming were found to be photochemical ozone production, acidification, eutrophication, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, human toxicity, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, and terrestrial ecotoxicity. The main factors associated with different environmental impacts and the environmental impacts themselves were found to differ across different phases. Some environmental impacts were shown to be sensitive to electricity, and the eutrophication potential and photochemical ozone creation potential showed the least sensitivity to all variables. To reduce the environmental impact of the anaerobic digestion–aerobic composting treatment technique, the energy structure and consumption of electricity, water, and diesel need to be optimized.

Highlights

  • Food waste (FW) creates environmental and food security problems in society due to the impacts associated with both the production and treatment of FW in China

  • We assessed the environmental impact of the life cycle of different treatment techniques of restaurant food waste in Lanzhou

  • After normalizing the assessment of various types of environmental impacts, they were found to be, from greatest to least effect, global warming potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential, human toxicity potential, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential, and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential. These results indicate that, in the life cycle of restaurant food waste treatment, the greatest environmental impact comes from the emission of greenhouse gases, and the least pronounced environmental impact is the ecotoxicity potential from toxic and hazardous substances produced from restaurant food waste

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Food waste (FW) creates environmental and food security problems in society due to the impacts associated with both the production and treatment (or reusing) of FW in China. Restaurant FW has a high water content, high salt content, high organic matter content, and significant temporal and spatial differences in components; it can be harmful and useful [2]. Traditional treatment techniques, such as landfills and incineration, involve considerable environmental hazards and high costs, and they produce less pronounced economic benefits [3].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call