Abstract

BackgroundLeukocyte esterase (LE) was recently reported to be an accurate marker for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as defined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. However, the diagnostic value of the LE test for PJI after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the reliability of the subjective visual interpretation of the LE test, and the correlation between the LE test results and the current MSIS criteria remain unclear. MethodsThis study prospectively enrolled 60 patients undergoing revision TKA for either PJI or aseptic failure. Serological marker, synovial fluid, and histological analyses were performed in all cases. The PJI group comprised 38 cases that met the MSIS criteria and the other 22 cases formed the aseptic group. All the LE tests were interpreted using both visual judgment and automated colorimetric reader. ResultsWhen “++” results were considered to indicate a positive PJI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 84, 100, 100, 79, and 90%, respectively. The visual interpretation agreed with the automated colorimetric reader in 90% of cases (Cronbach α = 0.894). The grade of the LE test was strongly correlated with the synovial white blood cell count (ρ = 0.695) and polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage (ρ = 0.638) and moderately correlated with the serum C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. ConclusionThe LE test has high diagnostic value for diagnosing PJI after TKA. Subjective visual interpretation of the LE test was reliable and valid for the current battery of PJI diagnostic tests according to the MSIS criteria.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.