Abstract

This article deals with the legal nature of commissions charged under credit agreements with regard to the approaches of judicial organs. The author reviews the jurisprudence and concludes that commission means different by nature payments made by the borrower under the loan agreement. Controversial approaches of courts are caused by the fact that Russian legislation does not provide for any legal concept of "Commission under loan agreements." The lender and the borrower may agree on any condition regarding commission in the loan agreement under Art. 421 of the RF Civil Code and Art. 29 of the Federal Law "On banks and banking activities, "in connection with which banks charge commissions for providing a separate service, for example, the commission for opening a loan account or granting a loan. Based on the relevant jurisprudence, commission charged by banks from borrowers under loan agreements can be divided into the commissions covering loan interests and commissions charged as payment for additional services (property benefit, useful effect); Individual commissions, such as the commission for reserving and booking funds, for changing loan terms, for early repayment of the loan are treated by some courts as payments for providing the borrower with useful effect or property benefit, and by other courts as expenses. Commissions that are paid periodically and accrued to the balance of indebtedness according to their legal nature amount to the payments covering interests charged for using a loan. In such a situation borrowers have the illusion that credit is provided under a lower interest rate, though a part of the interest payment is hidden in the commission. It is difficult to get the commissions back from the Bank. The paper concludes that the parties to the loan agreement must negotiate the commissions or the procedure of their estimation; otherwise, the recovery of such a commission may become impossible for the Bank, which is confirmed by the jurisprudence.

Highlights

  • ПРАВОВАЯ ПРИРОДА КОМИССИЙ ПО КРЕДИТНОМУ ДОГОВОРУ29 Федерального закона «О банках и банковской деятельности», в связи с чем банки нередко взыскивают комиссии, не обусловленные предоставлением с их стороны какой-либо самостоятельной услуги, например комиссии за открытие ссудного счета либо выдачу кредита

  • The author reviews the jurisprudence and concludes that commission means different by nature payments made by the borrower under the loan agreement

  • Commissions that are paid periodically and accrued to the balance of indebtedness according to their legal nature amount to the payments covering interests charged for using a loan

Read more

Summary

ПРАВОВАЯ ПРИРОДА КОМИССИЙ ПО КРЕДИТНОМУ ДОГОВОРУ

29 Федерального закона «О банках и банковской деятельности», в связи с чем банки нередко взыскивают комиссии, не обусловленные предоставлением с их стороны какой-либо самостоятельной услуги, например комиссии за открытие ссудного счета либо выдачу кредита. Основываясь на судебной практике, комиссии, взыскиваемые банками с заемщиков по кредитным договорам, можно разделить на комиссии, прикрывающие проценты за пользование кредитом, и комиссии, являющиеся платой за дополнительные услуги (имущественное благо, полезный эффект). В работе делается вывод о том, что стороны в кредитном договоре должны согласовывать размер комиссии либо порядок его определения, в ином случае взыскание такой комиссии может стать для банка невозможным, что подтверждается судебной практикой. Ключевые слова: комиссионное вознаграждение, комиссия за ведение ссудного счета, досрочный возврат кредита, кредитный договор, убытки, проценты, имущественное благо, полезный эффект, порядок уплаты, заемщик, кредитор. No 395-I «О банках и банковской деятельности»

LEX RUSSICA
ПОРЯДОК УПЛАТЫ И РАЗМЕР КОМИССИИ
THE LEGAL NATURE OF COMMISSIONS UNDER THE LOAN AGREEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call