The legal borders of the responsibility in private law

Abstract

The given article is dedicated to the research of the conception and principles of civil responsibility and to the analysis of thedynamics and legal relationship’s matter of civil responsibility, it is determined the functions and regulations of civil responsibility andit is considered several questions about conditions and effectiveness of civil responsibility in the dissertation.The need of new meaning of the legal responsibility is attempt to set in the present article. In article the author’s position on thequestion of the reinterpretation legal liability is proposed, problems of a civil liability in the system of the legal responsibility are investigated,works of the Ukrainian and foreign scientists are analyzed and changes in the legislation of Ukraine are offered.The author of this article propose personal way of resolving the underlined problems. The deep analysez of the researchers ofUkrainian and foreign scholars are proposed.One only priority arising from this research is need for greater familiarity with the substance and the meaning of long establishedhuman rights terminology in the languages through which this discussion is really proposed.A new combination of substantive human rights information, drawn from a variety of sources and also professional terminologyis clear. Meets a critical need in Ukrainian legal cooperation, the main vision in this research is definitely argued with the conditionsregards the main learning about legal liability. Written in a clear form, this publications combines factual information, according to thenowadays legislation, with a variety points of view of majority scholars. The main purpose of this article is emphasized mainly throughthe legal “bridge» of diversity by top meaning. However, the author’s point regards the borders of liability in private law is well-doneindeed.Notwithstanding its somewhat misleading name, it is clear that equitable form of liability can function, in some cases at least asa cause of action. The legal responsibility arising where a defendant breaches a contract or commits a delict may be seen as a ordinary(not twice) liability, as it depends on a delict by the defendant of a primary duty, imposed by the law of contract actually. The concept of an equity by contract liability may appear to be somewhat fabulous. It is often said for example, that, even after the facts giving riseto the enable rights have occurred, but before any court order in his or her favour, a claimant has only an “inchoate equity», rather thanany more specific right against the defendant. The conceptual doctrine fits well, on the other hand, with the idea of a primary liabilityaltogether is presented by authorThe legal borders of the private responsibility: The article is devoted to the multidisciplinary research about the borders of theprivate responsibility in the law system. The author vision in the research is emphasized mainly on the problem of determination.