Abstract
Kolb's reply to our critique of his learning style theory and Learning Style Inventory (LSI) inappropriately overgeneralizes our criticisms of the LSI to all experiential learning theories, excuses low reliability estimates as part of his theory, depends largely on unpublished studies to support his views, and claims strong construct validity support based on unpublished correlations that never exceed -.37. Judged by accepted academic standards, the LSI is an instrument that, if used on an individual learning basis, will result in excessive unreliable and invalid inferences on the part of the user.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
