Abstract
Figures compiled by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press show that most subpoenas to the news media seek nonconfidential information, opening the door for subpoenas and other legal actions that could seriously infringe First Amendment rights to a free flow of information and an independent press. While courts in most of the nineteen states without shield laws protect confidential sources, however, courts in only two states extend the privilege to nonconfidential information in both civil and criminal proceedings. Protection for nonconfidential information may require the passage of a shield law in Texas, where the courts are especially hostile to privileges for reporters. However, in other states a strong argument based on protecting press autonomy may help the press prevail.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
