Abstract
This article conducts a historical analysis of newspaper coverage and governmental debates from 1834 to 1837 over whether abolitionists should be restricted from the postal networks in the South. Three thematic categories emerged from my analysis of a controversy over abolitionists using the postal network in 1835: (1) balancing government regulation with free expression in the postal network, (2) concerns about individual postmasters meddling in the network, and (3) support for regulation, bridging postal law reform and ethics. This article contends that the 1835 debate showed the limitations of a libertarian understanding of free expression in the United States. These findings contextualize contemporary debates over reconciling the First Amendment with government regulation of digital networks when fashioning media policies that shape content moderation and free expression on digital platforms.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
