Abstract

Human multimodal communication can be said to serve two main purposes: information transfer and social influence. In this paper, I argue that different components of multimodal signals play different roles in the processes of information transfer and social influence. Although the symbolic components of communication (e.g., verbal and denotative signals) are well suited to transfer conceptual information, emotional components (e.g., non-verbal signals that are difficult to manipulate voluntarily) likely take a function that is closer to social influence. I suggest that emotion should be considered a property of communicative signals, rather than an entity that is transferred as content by non-verbal signals. In this view, the effect of emotional processes on communication serve to change the quality of social signals to make them more efficient at producing responses in perceivers, whereas symbolic components increase the signals’ efficiency at interacting with the cognitive processes dedicated to the assessment of relevance. The interaction between symbolic and emotional components will be discussed in relation to the need for perceivers to evaluate the reliability of multimodal signals.

Highlights

  • This article revolves around two ideas that have stayed, in my opinion, on the fringes of research in human communication

  • The question of what is transmitted in non-verbal communication has kept researchers busy for the last decades

  • Looking for information about emotion or its components (Ekman et al, 1980; Scherer and Grandjean, 2008), information about social motives (Fridlund, 1994; Parkinson, 2005), information about personality (Hall et al, 2005), or information about attitudes (Mehrabian, 1971), non-verbal communication research has been on an incessant quest for signal meaning

Read more

Summary

Marc Mehu*

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology. The symbolic components of communication (e.g., verbal and denotative signals) are well suited to transfer conceptual information, emotional components (e.g., non-verbal signals that are difficult to manipulate voluntarily) likely take a function that is closer to social influence. I suggest that emotion should be considered a property of communicative signals, rather than an entity that is transferred as content by non-verbal signals. In this view, the effect of emotional processes on communication serve to change the quality of social signals to make them more efficient at producing responses in perceivers, whereas symbolic components increase the signals’ efficiency at interacting with the cognitive processes dedicated to the assessment of relevance.

Introduction
Information Transfer and Social Influence in Human Communication
The Complexity of Human Communication is Reflected in Multimodal Signals
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call