Abstract
The actions of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the core of the nucleus accumbens including increasing dopamine release and inducing conditioned place preference in stress-naïve animals. However, following two-day, repeated forced swim stress (rFSS), neither of these effects are present, indicating a stress-sensitive interaction between CRF and dopamine. To ascertain the degree to which this mechanism influences integrated, reward-based decision making, we used an operant concurrent-choice task where mice could choose between two liquid receptacles containing a sucrose solution or water delivery. Following initial training, either a CRF or dopamine antagonist, α-helical CRF (9–41) and flupenthixol, respectively, or vehicle was administered intracranially to the nucleus accumbens core. Next, the animals underwent rFSS, were reintroduced to the task, and were retested. Prior to stress, mice exhibited a significant preference for sucrose over water and made more total nose pokes into the sucrose receptacle than the water receptacle throughout the session. There were no observed sex differences. Stress did not robustly affect preference metrics but did increase the number of trial omissions compared to their stress-naïve, time-matched counterparts. Interestingly, flupenthixol administration did not affect sucrose choice but increased their nosepoke preference during the inter-trial interval, increased trial omissions, and decreased the total nosepokes during the ITI. In contrast, microinjections of α-helical CRF (9–41) did not affect omissions or ITI nosepokes but produced interactions with stress on choice metrics. These data indicate that dopamine and CRF both interact with stress to impact performance in the task but influence different behavioral aspects.
Highlights
Perturbations in the dopamine monoaminergic system contribute to several psychiatric disorders, including Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Criteria for advancement to test days was for each animal to reach >75% preference for sucrose during free-choice trials. (B) Total cue-guidance verification represented by comparing the average free-choice latency (±SEM) to choose to 50% of the average nosepoke inter-trial interval (ITI) response interval (±SEM) in the days leading up to the first test day. (C) Cue guidance verification of responses made for the discrete cues associated with sucrose forced choices. (D) Cue guidance verification of responses made for the discrete cues associated with water forced choices. (E–H) Comparison between male (n = 10) and female (n = 10) mice for reinforced choice (E), baseline preference (F), number of trial omissions (G), and baseline responding (H)
The same was true for force-choice trials: latencies were significantly shorter than half of the average time between responses during the ITI for their respective receptacle [sucrose: F(1, 38) = 45.79, p < 0.0001; FIGURE 4 | Influence of dopamine antagonism on decision-making behaviors. (A) Averaged percentage of reinforced choice for the sucrose liquid receptacle in free-choice trials in sessions before (PreFSS) and after (PostFSS) the repeated forced swim stress (rFSS) for animals receiving either flupenthixol (20 μg/0.5 μL; n = 19) or vehicle. (B) Percentage of ITI nosepokes made during the session for the sucrose liquid receptacle compared to water receptacle nosepokes during the ITI. (C) Total number of omissions made during the sessions. (D) Total number of ITI nosepokes made at all during the sessions
Summary
Perturbations in the dopamine monoaminergic system contribute to several psychiatric disorders, including Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The dopamine-rich nucleus accumbens (NAc) serves as an integrator of limbic, motor, and cognitive information and may act as a hub between stress and reward-responses, leading to affective action selection [1, 2]. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is released in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in response to stress and, more generally, when an individual experiences invigorating stimuli, regardless of the affective value [4,5,6]. CRF and its two receptor subtypes, CRFR1 and CRFR2, are found in the anterior pituitary, but are distributed throughout the brain, including dopamine-rich areas such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA), NAc and prefrontal cortices [7, 8]. Work from our lab has shown directly that CRF administration potentiates dopamine in the NAc and produces a positive affective state, but this potentiation is abolished following exposure to repeated forced swim stress (rFSS) with a concomitant shift in affective response to CRF to aversion [12]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have