Abstract

Theory predicts that animals should prefer habitats where their fitness is maximized but some mistakenly select habitats where their fitness is compromised, that is, ecological traps. Understanding why this happens requires knowledge of the habitat selection cues animals use, the habitats they prefer and why, and the fitness costs of habitat selection decisions. We conducted experiments with a freshwater insect, the non‐biting midge Chironomus tepperi to ask: (a) whether females respond to potential oviposition cues, (b) to explore whether oviposition is adaptive in relation to metal pollution and conductivity, and (c) whether individuals raised in poor quality sites are more likely to breed in similarly poor locations. We found the following: (a) females responded to some cues, especially conductivity and conspecifics, (b) females preferred sites with higher concentrations of bioavailable metals but suffered no consequences to egg/larval survival, (c) females showed some avoidance of high conductivities, but they still laid eggs resulting in reduced egg hatching, larval survival, and adult emergence, and (d) preferences were independent of natal environment. Our results show that C. tepperi is susceptible to ecological traps, depending on life stage and the relative differences in conductivities among potential oviposition sites. Our results highlight that (a) the fitness outcomes of habitat selection need to be assessed across the life cycle and (b) the relative differences in preference/suitability of habitats need to be considered in ecological trap research. This information can help determine why habitat preferences and their fitness consequences differ among species, which is critical for determining which species are susceptible to ecological traps.

Highlights

  • Habitat selection can have profound effects on population growth, influence species interactions, and determine assemblage composition (Morris, 2003)

  • Oviposition preferences were consistent across the two natal environments; we found no support for natal habitat preference induction (F3,160 = 0.95, p = 0.42)

  • Some species can alter their behaviors to adapt to HIREC, such as birds adjusting their behaviors in urban areas (Sol, Lapiedra, & Gonzalez‐Lagos, 2013), but many other species fail to adapt

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Habitat selection can have profound effects on population growth, influence species interactions, and determine assemblage composition (Morris, 2003). Natal experience can have strong influences on habitat selection behavior and how ecological traps affect animals. NHPI can lessen the effects of ecological traps (Kokko & Sutherland, 2001), as reproductive output is increased in higher quality habitats, which more animals select later in life. C. tepperi is an ideal model species: it is widely distributed and lives in ephemeral habitats where environmental conditions are likely to fluctuate and females generally only mate once (Martin & Porter, 1978), so there is likely to be strong selection on oviposition behavior. Test whether natal habitat preference induction can exacerbate the effects of ecological traps, by individuals that are born into poor fitness locations choosing similar ones to breed in

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.