Abstract
Abstract: In this experimental study with 62 university students, we examined to what extent the hope or hopelessness they experience during reading a text affect their comprehension as well as the magnitude and accuracy of their predictions and postdictions. Moreover, we investigated whether the impact of the emotional state varies with a recue instruction that explicitly indicates the limited validity of emotions as judgment cues. The results showed that the students used their experienced hope or hopelessness to make predictions and postdictions. This effect did not differ depending on whether they had received the recue or a control instruction. However, when students received the control instruction, greater hopelessness impaired comprehension, whereas this was not the case with the recue instruction. Finally, the instruction type did not play a moderating role in the influence of the emotional state on prediction and postdiction accuracy. Yet, concerning postdiction accuracy, students who received the recue instruction were more accurate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
