Abstract
In the Netherlands, the government has become involved in public service interpreting by issuing measures shaping the professional conditions for interpreters and by monitoring the quality of their services. Under the Sworn Interpreters and Translators Act (2007) a register was set up for interpreters who meet predefined requirements for “basic interpreter competencies”. According to the 2007 Act, institutions in the legal domain as well as in the immigration and police services are obliged to work exclusively with certified interpreters. In this way, the government has contributed to the professionalization of legal interpreting. In recent years however, this development has been reversed in other sectors of public service interpreting (PSI). Some forms of PSI, it would seem, are more equal than others. In public health for example, there are only advisory regulations concerning the use of interpreters, and there is no obligation to work with certified interpreters. Although the government was initially involved in the administration and financing of interpreting agencies in all the fields of PSI, over the years it has gradually transferred this responsibility to the users of these services. In 2012, the government stopped most of its funding of healthcare interpreting. In spite of the presence of several indicators of professionalization of interpreters in the Netherlands, such as certification, a code of ethics, compensation and a system of continuing education for interpreters, their effectiveness is limited because they concern only interpreters working in the legal domain or in immigration and police services. The level of professionalization in PSI as a whole could be increased if the government were to implement its theoretical stance that both legal and healthcare interpreting are matters of public interest enshrined in the Dutch law, and if other fields of PSI besides legal interpreting were included in the existing framework for certification, training and continuing education.
Highlights
Like many other countries in Western Europe, the Netherlands has been a recipient country of an increasing number of immigrants since the 1970s, rendering interpreting in the public services necessary
The present paper provides an overview of these shifts in government policy regarding public service interpreting in the Netherlands and investigates how this policy, especially the policy concerning the certification and funding of PSI, has influenced the interpreting profession
Compared to the tariffs in the private sector, the fixed rates are 30% lower (Baarsma & Prins, 2013, p. 5). This overview shows how the Dutch government has been actively involved in shaping the professional conditions for interpreters in the legal field, on the one hand, and how, on the other hand, it has gradually transferred the responsibility for the administration of PSI services and their financing to the users of these services
Summary
Like many other countries in Western Europe, the Netherlands has been a recipient country of an increasing number of immigrants since the 1970s, rendering interpreting in the public services necessary. There are specialized courses for legal interpreters offered by professional organizations, the Dutch institutions that provide interpreter training make no distinction between the different fields and offer general interpreter training courses at bachelor level. In keeping with this situation, the term “public service interpreting” will be used in this paper to refer to all kinds of interpreting in the public sector, including legal interpreting, as defined by Baraldi and Gavioli (2012): Translation & Interpreting Vol 7 No 3 (2015). For the purposes of this paper, only the situation of spoken language interpreters will be considered
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
