Abstract
BackgroundClose, continuous and efficient collaboration between different professions and sectors of care is necessary to provide patient-centered care for individuals with mental disorders. The lack of structured collaboration between in- and outpatient care constitutes a limitation of the German health care system. Since 2012, a new law in Germany (§64b Social code book (SGB) V) has enabled the establishment of cross-sectoral and patient-centered treatment models in psychiatry. Such model projects follow a capitation budget, i.e. a total per patient budget of inpatient and outpatient care in psychiatric clinics. Providers are able to choose the treatment form and adapt the treatment to the needs of the patients. The present study (EVA64) will investigate the effectiveness, costs and efficiency of almost all model projects established in Germany between 2013 and 2016.Methods/designA health insurance data-based controlled cohort study is used. Data from up to 89 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds, i.e. 79% of all SHI funds in Germany (May 2017), on inpatient and outpatient care, pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical treatments and sick leave for a period of 7 years will be analyzed. All patients insured by any of the participating SHI funds and treated in one of the model hospitals for any of 16 pre-defined mental disorders will be compared with patients in routine care. Sick leave (primary outcome), utilization of inpatient care (primary outcome), utilization of outpatient care, continuity of contacts in (psychiatric) care, physician and hospital hopping, re-admission rate, comorbidity, mortality, disease progression, and guideline adherence will be analyzed. Cost and effectivity of model and routine care will be estimated using cost-effectiveness analyses. Up to 10 control hospitals for each of the 18 model hospitals will be selected according to a pre-defined algorithm.DiscussionThe evaluation of complex interventions is an important main task of health services research and constitutes the basis of evidence-guided advancement in health care. The study will yield important new evidence to guide the future provision of routine care for mentally ill patients in Germany and possibly beyond.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the database “Health Services Research Germany” (trial number: VVfD_EVA64_15_003713).
Highlights
Close, continuous and efficient collaboration between different professions and sectors of care is necessary to provide patient-centered care for individuals with mental disorders
The study will yield important new evidence to guide the future provision of routine care for mentally ill patients in Germany and possibly beyond
The financing of the German psychiatric health care system is currently fragmented constituting another barrier towards efficient collaboration across sectors [8]
Summary
The evaluation of complex interventions in the health care sector is one main task of health service research and is the basis for evidence-based health care provision and development. The evaluation on the basis of data from almost all German statutory health insurance funds allows a comprehensive evaluation of the health care of mental disorders Such a common evaluation is unique in Germany and is, as indicated above, requested from other studies. Politics and SHI funds together have enabled researchers to form the basis of an evidence-guided decision on psychiatric care for adults and children/adolescents in Germany Information derived from this evaluation will give further insight into effectivity, cost and cost-effectivity of 18 model projects based on capitation principle. MS contributed to data handling and selection of control hospitals, contributed substantially to the study design and critically reviewed the manuscript. JW advised in regard to psychiatric care among children and adolescents, contributed substantially to the study design and critically reviewed the manuscript.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.