Abstract

Prosthetic materials must exhibit adequate resistance to the oral environment. The aim of this paper was to study the resistance of selected cements used for cementing restorations (Breeze—composite, Adhesor Carbofine—zinc-polycarboxylate and IHDENT–Giz type II—glass-ionomer) against ethanol, soda and green tea solutions. The highest values of hardness and DTS (diametral tensile strength) were obtained by composite cement (HV = 15–31, DTS = 34–45 MPa). Ethanol solution had the greatest impact on the hardness value of composite cement, and soda solution on zinc-polycarboxylate cement. No significant differences were noted in the DTS values of composite cements after immersion in solvents; however, the DTS value of zinc-polycarboxylate cement increased after prolonged immersion time in ethanol and the DTS of glass-ionomer cement (IHDENT Giz type II) clearly decreased after submersion in soda solutions. Variation in pH across the range of 6 (tea) to 9 (soda solution) had a low impact on the properties of dental cements. Extended exposure to solvents appears to worsen the properties of cements.

Highlights

  • Dental cements have a wide range of applications in modern dentistry

  • diametral tensile strength (DTS) results indicate that Breeze has than the zinc-polycarboxylate cement (Figures 1 and 2)

  • DTS results indicate that Breeze has the highest the highest strength (Figures 3–5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental cements have a wide range of applications in modern dentistry. They are used for luting, fixation and cementation, i.e., luting inlays crowns, bridges, veneers on the prepared tooth. They protect pulp from heat (“thermal insulation”) and from chemical irritation (liners and bases), they stimulate secondary dentin formation and act as temporary filling material. Dental cements constitute an important element during prosthetic treatment. These materials are designed to bond the restoration to the natural teeth of the patient or metallic core. As there is currently no ideal cement that can meet all the requirements in terms of mechanical and biological properties, it is important to make an appropriate individual selection for each patient based on the properties of the materials [2,3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call