The importance of pulmonary venous flow measurement for evaluating left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease in the early stage of Diastolic Dysfunction

Abstract

Transmitral flow pattern assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography is widely used to evaluate left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). A restrictive mitral flow pattern is well recognized as a finding of severely elevated LVEDP. On the other hand, an abnormal relaxation pattern can be interpreted many ways. For example, some patients who display an abnormal relaxation pattern have a mild impairment of left ventricular (LV) relaxation as a result of aging, and others have severely impaired LV diastolic function. To evaluate LVEDP in patients with abnormal relaxation mitral filling patterns, we studied 55 patients who had coronary artery disease with abnormal relaxation pattern who underwent elective cardiac catheterization. We recorded the transmitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity curves and measured the duration of the mitral A wave (MAd) and pulmonary venous reversal wave during atrial contraction (PAd). Positive correlations were found between PAd and LVEDP (r = 0.65, P <.01) and between PAd-MAd and LVEDP (r = 0.7, P <.0001); however, MAd was not significantly correlated with LVEDP. In conclusion, PAd must be measured for an accurate evaluation of LV end-diastolic pressure in patients with an abnormal relaxation pattern in the transmitral flow velocity curve.