Abstract

This paper describes simple, realistic circumstances in which the noise component of a population model dramatically influences conclusions from the analysis. The first example, restricted to five data values, illustrates geometrically why different statistical assumptions can lead to fundamentally different results. Such diverse conclusions can also be a problem in realistic data analysis, as illustrated by a second example involving catch per unit effort (CPUE) data from a lingcod ( Ophiodon elongatus) stock. Using methods adapted from Kalman filter theory, I show that a high or low estimate of survival depends on whether or not the model allows for measurement error. Furthermore, additional data suggest that the more complex model with measurement error is more realistic. I conclude that earlier work on deterministic models may be somewhat misdirected, because statistics is treated almost as an afterthought.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.