Abstract
In contemporary stock assessments there is increasing emphasis on how natural mortality varies with time, age, and space. But, little guidance is available for estimating this parameter. We maintain that in an exploited population, with few exceptions, contrast in fishing mortality in the data is needed to separate fishing mortality from natural mortality. Variability (contrast) in fishing mortality can be over time (inter- or intra-annual), space, and ontogeny. (The exceptions where contrast in fishing mortality is not needed are cases where information is available on population size and total catch.) High contrast in fishing mortality results in enhanced ability to estimate natural mortality. It follows that study design can be manipulated to achieve greater contrast and make more effective use of existing contrast. Integrated stock assessments afford the opportunity to enhance the needed contrast, provided the contrast is modeled explicitly.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.