Abstract
Democracy in Indonesia, characterized by periodic elections, grants the people the right to choose leaders at various levels of government. Despite significant transitions since the 1998 reform, challenges in the implementation of democracy, such as the empty box phenomenon in regional head elections (Pilkada), persist. This phenomenon refers to situations where no qualified candidates are proposed, which can affect public political participation. This study aims to analyze the implications of the empty box phenomenon on political participation and the efforts that can be made to address it. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, as well as descriptive analysis of secondary data. The results indicate that the empty box can decrease political participation, trigger social conflict, and hinder regional development. Efforts to address this phenomenon include improving candidate quality, involving the community in the nomination process, and educating voters. With these measures, it is hoped that public political participation can increase and the quality of regional head elections can be maintained.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.