Abstract

Although the Republic of Moldova has experienced massive increase in vehicle ownership and use, some of the latest advances in how to approach and nurture public space are underutilized. This article summarizes the basic findings of a project aimed at transfer of knowledge and the implementation of the smart city process in Chișinău, Moldova. Chișinău presents a perfect opportunity for full-scale transformation regarding mobility in the smart city process. In its current state, where there are still enough opportunities to make significant improvements and for the region itself, the Republic of Moldova falls into the category of middle- to lower-income countries. Moreover, this article looks at the difficulties of preparing a smart mobility strategy while under the effect of the current COVID-19 pandemic in the form of social distancing by the city. The subject of study is to determine whether a long-distance strategy can be properly created and introduced, mostly based on proper communication. Key data sources were examined and chosen as the basis for determining weaknesses and as a basis for determining the main pillars. While challenging, this paper finds distanced knowledge transfer and planning to be achievable.

Highlights

  • The smart city process needs to be anthropocentric; we must not see the smart city process solely as a technology implementation task, but as a reformation of public space to suit the needs of individual humans

  • The presented procedure described in this article fully respects methodological approaches such as the Newcastle City Council Smart City Strategy 2017–2021 (Australia) [24]

  • The lack of some data, lack of on-site survey of the working team, and having to conduct all interviews and communication solely through the digital environment have all put the team through a test of how possible it is to reach the correct conclusion about the current state of transport and mobility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The smart city process needs to be anthropocentric; we must not see the smart city process solely as a technology implementation task, but as a reformation of public space to suit the needs of individual humans. The author mentioned that it is easy to be enticed by impressive visions of smart cities and pay attention to what is missing rather than utilizing amenities of the city She highlights the importance of selecting a few main areas that need to be improved as a matter of priority. Stakeholders can, for example, provide important information about the needs of the city or increase the public acceptance of projects She mentioned that smart cities can be developed through small-scale projects if they are a part of broader strategic plans anticipating synergies among them. These small projects are more user-friendly and increase the awareness and possibility of acceptance by citizens.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call