Abstract

This study explores the implementation of teaching supervision in Excellence Cluster National Secondary Schools and Daily Secondary Schools. This study adopts the qualitative exploratory approach and involves eight study samples selected by purposive sampling. Methods of interview, observation and document analysis were used as the main tools in collecting the study data. The data collected were analysed using in-depth reading, open coding and axial coding. The results of the study as a whole show that the two categories of schools do not show differences in the characteristics studied in the implementation of teaching supervision in secondary schools. The study’s findings show that teaching supervision in Excellence Cluster Secondary Schools and Daily Secondary Schools is implemented through the devolution of power to middle leaders. Teaching supervision is guided by the teaching supervision form found in SKPMG2 standard 4. Teaching supervision in both school categories is done three times a year involving three phases. Moreover, teaching evaluation is done through direct observation in the classroom with full guidance on the teaching supervision form. The similarity in the implementation of teaching supervision is due to the same challenges faced by principals in both school categories, namely time constraints and administrative workload. The findings also show that supervisors use no specific approach for teaching supervision. The implication of this study is that it provides an insight into the implementation of teaching supervision by school administrators and that strengthening the skills and knowledge of middle leaders could improve teaching supervision effectiveness and positively impact the students, teachers and the school.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Quality of TeachingThe quality of teaching could be assessed through students’ ability to acquire the content knowledge during a lesson

  • The first part focuses on answering the first research question, ‘What is the form of teaching supervision implementation in Excellence Cluster Secondary Schools and Daily Secondary Schools’ while the second part focuses on discussing, ‘ What are the teaching supervision practices implemented in Excellence Cluster Secondary Schools and Daily Secondary Schools ?’ The discussion of the study’s findings is presented below

  • The Ministry of Education Malaysia has instructed schools to implement teaching supervision to ensure that the learning curriculum is implemented as prescribed through its SPI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Quality of TeachingThe quality of teaching could be assessed through students’ ability to acquire the content knowledge during a lesson. Teaching supervision is a mechanism that is seen to be appropriate in helping, guiding and improving the quality of teaching and further developing the professionalism of teachers. Teaching supervision is seen as a measuring tool to determine whether teachers can deliver the curriculum as prescribed. Effective teaching supervision implementation will help increase teaching quality through supervisors’ guidance and sharing of expertise. The success of teaching supervision is associated with the effectiveness of the leadership style adopted by school administrators, especially principals as instructional leaders. The practice of teaching supervision plays a role in determining the effectiveness of teaching supervision implemented. In this study, teaching supervision practices refer to the supervisors’ approach while performing teaching supervision in the classroom. The clinical supervision approach is effective in helping to improve the quality of teaching and develop teacher professionalism

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call