Abstract

A comparative study Biodiversity is not a static phenomenon and many variables have an effect on accelerated biodiversity loss. While most of the variables affecting biodiversity loss are caused by humankind, many species are affected by more than one variable simultaneously. Six fundamental causes for biodiversity loss have been identifi ed, namely unsustainable population growth and associated increased pressure on natural resources; a reduced spectrum of agricultural, forestry and fishery products; failure of economic systems to attach appropriate economic value to the environment and resources; inequality in ownership, flow and management of the benefits and utilisation of resources; insufficient knowledge in the application and use of resources; and legislation and institutional systems that promote unsustainable abuse of the environment (Middleton 2003:250). The worldwide loss of biodiversity makes the management of protected areas more important than ever. Protected areas are under increasing pressure to become economically viable and independent of state grants. Tourism creates the mechanism and opportunities for protected areas to increase their economic viability while advancing the appreciation of nature. The management of these protected areas therefore includes the management of visitors. South Africa is the third most bio diverse country in the world. Amongst a variety of nature conservation endeavours nine national botanical gardens are managed by the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). One of the nine national gardens is the Walter Sisulu National Botanical Garden situated in Roodekrans towards the west of Johannesburg. A study was launched to determine preferences of visitors to the Walter Sisulu National Botanical Garden by making use of semi-structured interviews. The purpose of the study was threefold. Firstly the study was launched to determine whether visitors to the garden had an increased awareness of the ideals of environmental conservation after their visit to the garden. Secondly, the study determined the spatial preferences of visitors to the garden which was thirdly correlated to the time that they spent at each area. A number of recommendations were made and a comparative study followed twelve years after the initial study in which the implementation of the resultant findings was determined through observation and a comparison of information pamphlets and garden layout maps. It was found that large-scale changes took place in line with the recommendations made after the initial study. These included the demolition of unsuccessful theme gardens and their replacement by topical theme gardens such as water-wise gardens and a garden that attracts butterflies and birds. The educational function of the Walter Sisulu National Botanical Garden was greatly improved by adding more information plaques throughout the garden, a new interpretative centre and many additional information pamphlets that had been absent during the initial study. Major structural changes were made, such as the building of an amphitheatre which reduced the negative impact of noise and disturbance surrounding the nests of the Verreaux’s eagles that breed successfully in the garden. The changes undertaken at the garden show innovative improvements in line with the con servation principles outlined by the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). The evidence of the implementation of research recommendations from the initial study could play a direct role in improving the visitor experience, which would facilitate the economic viability of the Walter Sisulu National Botanical Garden in its endeavours to reach its conservation goals. Further research is suggested to continuously determine the areas of preference of visitors in the evolving landscape of the garden to ensure renewed interest of visitors to the garden. If botanical gardens want to succeed in their goal to increase the environmental awareness and consciousness of visitors, continuous visitor and tourism research is required to improve the visitor experiences that will result in drawing visitors in future.

Highlights

  • Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie, Jaargang 28 No 3: September 2009 and utilisation of resources; (5) insufficient knowledge in the application and use of resources; and (6) legislation and institutional systems that promote unsustainable abuse of the environment (Middleton 2003:250)

  • Die doelstellings van die opvolgstudie was om vas te stel tot watter mate die aanbevelings wat in die eerste studie gemaak was, 12 jaar later in die tuin geïmplementeer is

  • Die bepaling van die besoeker se indrukke ten opsigte van die bewaring van plante het aangetoon dat 98% van die respondente gereken het dat plante wel vir die omgewing belangrik is en slegs 2% van die respondente van mening was dat plante nie juis ’n belangrike rol in die omgewing speel nie

Read more

Summary

INLEIDING

Kommer oor die grootskaalse wêreldwye verlies aan biodiversiteit en die vooruitsigte vir toekomstige oorlewing is gesetel in die wete dat plante en diere in die verlede uitgesterf het (Jeffries 2006:19). In 2005 het die Departement van Omgewingsake en Toerisme aangekondig dat net minder as 6% van Suid-Afrika se landoppervlak aan bewaring toegewy is (Department of Environment and Tourism (DEAT) 2005). Daar bestaan verskeie tipes bewaringsgebiede wêreldwyd, en botaniese tuine is een van die maniere waarop biodiversiteit op die aarde bewaar kan word. Wêreldwyd bestaan daar meer as 1 500 botaniese tuine waarin 15% van die wêreld se plantspesies (nagenoeg 35 000 spesies in totaal) bewaar word. Sodoende word gepoog om die fasiliteite, kennis en kundigheid wat noodsaaklik is vir die bewaring, volhoubare gebruik, waardering en genot van Suid-Afrika se uitsonderlike ryk biodiversiteit, te voorsien (SANBI 2005). Paradis en Nyeck (1997:253) meen dat ’n besoek aan ’n botaniese tuin as ’n hedonistiese ervaring beskou kan word aangesien dit verband hou met ’n multisensoriese, fantasie- en emotiewe aspek van die verbruikerservaring. In hierdie artikel word die bevindinge van die 1995-studie ten opsigte van die implementering van die aanbevelings bespreek

DOELSTELLINGS
METODOLOGIE
Beginsels van bewaring
Voorkeurgebiede
Tydsbesteding
Implementering van navorsingsvoorstelle
Findings
SAMEVATTING
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call