The Impact on Vision of Aspheric to Spherical Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Abstract

<h3>Purpose</h3> To provide a summary of the impact on vision of an aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) compared with a spherical IOL in cataract surgery. <h3>Design</h3> Systematic review with meta-analysis. <h3>Participants</h3> Patients from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cataract surgery with aspheric compared with spherical monofocal IOL implantation. <h3>Methods</h3> We systematically searched the peer-reviewed literature in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library according to the Cochrane Collaboration method to identify relevant RCTs. The inclusion criteria were RCTs on cataract surgery comparing the use of aspheric versus spherical IOL implantation that assessed visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, or quality of vision. The effects were calculated as mean differences or standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) and pooled using random-effect models. <h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3> Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, and subjective perception of the quality of vision. <h3>Results</h3> Forty-three studies provided data and were included, comprising 2076 eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs and 2034 eyes implanted with spherical IOLs. The BCVA showed a significant difference for aspheric IOLs (−0.01 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.02 to −0.00). For contrast sensitivity, a significant advantage for aspheric IOLs was found under photopic and mesopic light conditions (photopic: Hedges' g 0.42, 95% CI 0.24–0.61 (3 cycles per degree [cpd]) to 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.73 (12 cpd); mesopic: Hedges' g 0.49, 95% CI 0.23–0.75 (1.5 cpd) to 0.76, 95% CI 0.52–1.00 (18 cpd)). Questionnaires targeting the subjective perception of quality of vision yielded less conclusive results. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Overall, a patient may achieve better contrast sensitivity with an aspheric IOL than with a spherical IOL, especially under dim light. There was no clinically relevant difference in BCVA between aspheric and spherical IOL implantation. The findings on the subjective perception of visual quality were heterogeneous with no clear result favoring either option. <h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3> The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.