Abstract

Anthropogenic activity can increase water turbidity, changing fish behaviour by reducing visibility. The spread of invasive species is also facilitated by human activity, further increasing the pressure on native species. In two experiments, we measured the foraging efficiency, risk perception and inter-individual consistency of risk-taking (personality variation in boldness) of an invasive species, the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), and a threatened tilapia, the Manyara tilapia (Oreochromis amphimelas), in clear and turbid water. In experiment one, O. niloticus was faster to initiate feeding, encountered more food items and consumed more than O. amphimelas. The latency to start foraging by O. niloticus decreased in turbid water. Turbidity did not affect the latency to start foraging in O. amphimelas but the number of food items they encountered was highest at the intermediate turbidity. There was however no significant effect of turbidity in either species on the total food consumed. In contrast to this foraging context, in experiment two with a refuge and no food available, risk taking behaviour was similar in both species and they both responded with similarly reduced risk taking in turbid water. Evidence of personality variation was weak, being observed only in O. amphimelas when first leaving the shelter in turbid water. Overall, species differences were greater in the foraging context but turbidity was more important in the risk-taking context. O. amphimelas is more sensitive to turbidity during foraging, and O. niloticus is likely to have a competitive advantage in foraging situations, especially in degraded turbid habitats.Significance statementUnder human-induced environmental change, native species are often exposed to multiple stressors. Here, we tested the responses of two cichlid fish to increasing turbidity, the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), which is invasive throughout the tropics, and the Manyara tilapia (Oreochromis amphimelas), a threatened species, indigenous to Tanzania. We found that turbidity was beneficial to the foraging of O. niloticus, which in both clear and turbid water consumed and encountered more food than O. amphimelas. In contrast, without food present, both species displayed similar responses of increased risk perception in turbid water with little evidence of personality variation between individuals in either species. Our results suggest that invasive species tolerant of degraded habitats may outcompete less well-adapted native species for food.

Highlights

  • Turbidity is the cloudiness of water produced by suspended particles scattering light (Davies-Colley and Smith 2001)

  • The effect of species was significant; O. niloticus attempted to feed on a greater number of food items (negative binomial generalised linear models (GLMs): Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of fish that did not feed across the trial period (a) O. amphimelas and (b) O. niloticus in 0, 15 and 30 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) treatments a

  • Our results show that O. niloticus from aquaculture stock, which are those most likely to be introduced outside of the species’ native range, started to feed more quickly, encountered more food items and consumed more in total than O. amphimelas bred from wild-caught parents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Turbidity is the cloudiness of water produced by suspended particles scattering light (Davies-Colley and Smith 2001). Human-induced eutrophication and increased sedimentation are growing causes of habitat degradation in clear water systems and can drive rapid changes to the sensory environment (Julien 1995; Mol and Ouboter 2004; Dodds et al 2009; Erftemeijer et al 2012) Such changes influence the behaviour of many fish species that rely on vision, especially during foraging and predator-prey interactions (Guthrie and Muntz 1986; Abrahams and Kattenfeld 1997; Ferrari et al 2010a; Wishingrad et al 2015; Ehlman et al 2020). The behavioural responses of species to increased turbidity can heavily influence the effect it has on the survival of individuals and populations (Caves et al 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call