Abstract

ABSTRACTIn this article, we analyze the models quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains with stochastic lead times and find advantages and disadvantages of their approaches to the bullwhip problem. Moreover, using computer simulation, we find interesting insights into the bullwhip behavior for a particular instance of a multi-echelon supply chain with constant customer demands and random lead times. We confirm the recent finding of Michna and Nielsen that under certain circumstances lead time signal processing is by itself a fundamental cause of bullwhip effect just like demand-signal processing is. The simulation also shows that in this supply chain the delay parameter of demand forecasting smooths the bullwhip effect at the manufacturer level much faster than the delay parameter of lead time forecasting. Additionally, in the supply chain with random demands, the reverse behavior is observed, that is, the delay parameter of lead time forecasting smooths bullwhip effect at the retailer stage much faster than the delay parameter of demand forecasting. At the manufacturer level, the delay parameter of demand forecasting and the delay parameter of lead time forecasting dampen the effect with a similar strength.

Highlights

  • In this paper, we investigate and review the problem of stochastic lead times in supply chains

  • We investigate the work of Duc, Luong, and Kim (2008), where stochastic lead times are considered without forecasting and a recent model of Michna and Nielsen (2013) where the bullwhip effect is quantified in the presence of lead time forecasting

  • It is easy to notice that the delay parameter n can diminish the bullwhip effect if it increases, which practically means that the more accurate forecasting, the smaller the bullwhip effect (which is completely analog to the findings in Chen et al (2000a) on demand forecasting)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We investigate and review the problem of stochastic lead times in supply chains. We analyze a model (Michna, Nielsen, & Nielsen, 2013) (a slight modification of Kim, Chatfield, Harrison, & Hayya, 2006) where stochastic lead times and lead time demand forecasting are considered. In this model, the analytical expression for the bullwhip effect. We investigate the work of Duc, Luong, and Kim (2008), where stochastic lead times are considered without forecasting and a recent model of Michna and Nielsen (2013) where the bullwhip effect is quantified in the presence of lead time forecasting.

Models with stochastic lead times
Lead time demand forecasting using moving average
Stochastic lead times without forecasting
D σ2 1Àρ2 and the correlation coefficient
Stochastic lead times with forecasting
Conclusions and future research opportunities
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call