Abstract
Response inhibition is a central aspect of cognitive control. Usually, response inhibition is examined using information from a single sensory modality. Yet, evidence suggests that conflicts between information from different modalities affect response inhibition. It is, however, crucial to consider that there are modality differences in the efficiency to trigger response inhibition that may also modulate the impact of conflicts between different sensory modalities. In the current study, we compared an auditory–tactile to an auditory–visual Go/NO-GO task. We recorded EEG data and performed signal decomposition and source localization. On the behavioral level, we show stronger interference effects in the visual than the tactile modality. Despite sensory processes were experimentally varied, temporally decomposed EEG data show that response selection mechanisms are associated with these effects and not the sensory processing stage. These modulations of response selection processes occur in the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ, BA40) and inferior frontal structures (IFG, BA47). The smaller activity in the TPJ during auditory–tactile, compared to auditory–visual conflicts suggests that task representations are less affected by interfering auditory information when the tactile modality informs response inhibition processes. This also explains why less intense braking processes (reflected by IFG activity) are still able to maintain a reasonable response inhibition performance level. It can be concluded that the tactile and visual domains do not only differ in regard to their efficiency to trigger response inhibition processes but also in their susceptibility to interference while informing inhibitory control. Clinical implications are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.