Abstract

Models of associative memory with discrete state synapses learn new memories by forgetting old ones. In the simplest models, memories are forgotten exponentially quickly. Sparse population coding ameliorates this problem, as do complex models of synaptic plasticity that posit internal synaptic states, giving rise to synaptic metaplasticity. We examine memory lifetimes in both simple and complex models of synaptic plasticity with sparse coding. We consider our own integrative, filter-based model of synaptic plasticity, and examine the cascade and serial synapse models for comparison. We explore memory lifetimes at both the single-neuron and the population level, allowing for spontaneous activity. Memory lifetimes are defined using either a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) approach or a first passage time (FPT) method, although we use the latter only for simple models at the single-neuron level. All studied models exhibit a decrease in the optimal single-neuron SNR memory lifetime, optimised with respect to sparseness, as the probability of synaptic updates decreases or, equivalently, as synaptic complexity increases. This holds regardless of spontaneous activity levels. In contrast, at the population level, even a low but nonzero level of spontaneous activity is critical in facilitating an increase in optimal SNR memory lifetimes with increasing synaptic complexity, but only in filter and serial models. However, SNR memory lifetimes are valid only in an asymptotic regime in which a mean field approximation is valid. By considering FPT memory lifetimes, we find that this asymptotic regime is not satisfied for very sparse coding, violating the conditions for the optimisation of single-perceptron SNR memory lifetimes with respect to sparseness. Similar violations are also expected for complex models of synaptic plasticity.

Highlights

  • One line of experimental evidence suggests that synapses may occupy only a very limited number of discrete states of synaptic strength (Petersen et al 1998; Montgomery and Madison 2002, 2004; O’Connor et al 2005a, b; Bartol et al 2015), or may change their strengths via discrete, jump-like processes (Yasuda et al 2003; Bagal et al 2005; Sobczyk and Svoboda 2007)

  • We consider both first passage time (FPT) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) lifetimes, and for FPT lifetimes, we show results for both the Fokker–Planck equation (FPE) and matrix or integral equation (MIE) approaches

  • Sparse population coding enhances memory lifetimes in these memory models by reducing the overall rate of synaptic plasticity at single synapses, so effectively dilating time, and by decorrelating synaptic updates induced by overlapping memories (Tsodyks and Feigel’man 1988)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One line of experimental evidence suggests that synapses may occupy only a very limited number of discrete states of synaptic strength (Petersen et al 1998; Montgomery and Madison 2002, 2004; O’Connor et al 2005a, b; Bartol et al 2015), or may change their strengths via discrete, jump-like processes (Yasuda et al 2003; Bagal et al 2005; Sobczyk and Svoboda 2007). We have applied these complex models of synaptic plasticity to memory formation, retention and longevity with discrete synapses (Elliott and Lagogiannis 2012), finding that they outperform cascade models (Fusi et al 2005) in most biologically relevant regions of parameter space (Elliott 2016b). We consider the role of sparse coding in the memory dynamics of a filter-based model. 2, we present our general approach by describing the two memory storage protocols that we study, considering two different definitions of memory lifetimes, and obtaining general, modelindependent results. 3, we consider both simple and complex models of synaptic plasticity, obtaining the analytical results required to study memory lifetimes in detail. We compare and contrast results for memory lifetimes in simple and complex models in Sect.

Memories and memory lifetimes
Hebb protocol
Hopfield protocol
Population memory lifetimes
Complex synapses
Results
Single-perceptron memory lifetimes
Discussion
A Transition matrix elements and jump moments
B Hebb equilibrium structure for simple synapses
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call