Abstract

There exists considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction and its possible role in mitigating climate change. This study uses a multi-region energy system model, TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model), to consider the impact of a range of conventional and shale gas cost and availability assessments on mitigation scenarios aimed at achieving a limit to global warming of below 2 °C in 2100, with a 50% likelihood. When adding shale gas to the global energy mix, the reduction to the global energy system cost is relatively small (up to 0.4%), and the mitigation cost increases by 1%–3% under all cost assumptions. The impact of a “dash for shale gas”, of unavailability of carbon capture and storage, of increased barriers to investment in low carbon technologies, and of higher than expected leakage rates, are also considered; and are each found to have the potential to increase the cost and reduce feasibility of meeting global temperature goals. We conclude that the extraction of shale gas is not likely to significantly reduce the effort required to mitigate climate change under globally coordinated action, but could increase required mitigation effort if not handled sufficiently carefully.

Highlights

  • In recent years, there has been considerable global and regional interest in shale gas, which, it has been widely suggested, could play a role as a bridging fuel to a low-carbon future

  • Costs are shown in both absolute terms and as a percentage of the present value of future global gross domestic product (GDP) over the period 2012–2100

  • This is towards the lower end of the $34–288 trillion previously reported by Gambhir et al [69] and the

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been considerable global and regional interest in shale gas, which, it has been widely suggested, could play a role as a bridging fuel to a low-carbon future. There remains, considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction. This leads to considerable uncertainty in the role which shale gas could play in mitigating climate change. This paper quantifies uncertainties in supply and fugitive emissions, and uses a model of the global energy system to quantify the impact of these uncertainties on global energy supply mix and the cost of mitigation scenarios.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call