Abstract
Information on the forking, leaf area index, and biomass of cassava for different growing seasons could help design appropriate management to improve yield. The objective was to evaluate the forking date, leaf growth, and storage root yield of different cassava genotypes grown at different planting dates. Four cassava genotypes (Kasetsart 50, Rayong 9, Rayong 11, and CMR38–125–77) were evaluated using a randomized complete block design with four replications. The cassava genotypes were planted on 20 April, 25 May, 30 June, 5 October, 10 November, and 15 December 2015, and 19 May and 3 November 2016. The soil properties prior to the planting, forking date, leaf area index (LAI), dry weights, harvest index (HI), starch content, and weather data were recorded. The forking date patterns for all of the growing seasons varied depending on the cassava genotypes. The weather caused occurring in the first forking for the Rayong 11 and CMR38–125–77 and the second forking for Rayong 11, but not for Kasetsart 50. The forking CMR38–125–77 had a higher LAI, leaf dry weight, biomass, and storage root dry weight than the non-forking Rayong 9. The higher storage root yields in Rayong 9 compared with Rayong 11 were due to an increased partitioning of the storage roots.
Highlights
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is widely grown in tropical environments
The combined analysis for all of the planting dates for the dates at which 50% of plants showed forking in the main stem was conducted using the observations for the Kasetsart 50, Rayong 11, and CMR38–125–77 genotypes
Similar results were found for the days until the second forking, with variations of 54.0% and 32.1% for planting date and genotype × planting date, respectively
Summary
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is widely grown in tropical environments. It can be used for human consumption, animal feed, and for bioenergy production [1]. The average cassava storage root yield for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (21.7 t ha−1 ) is lower than the reported potential level of 80 t ha−1 [1,2]. This shortfall might be due to a lack of sufficient agro-advisory information about suitable cassava genotypes and appropriate management practices for the different growing seasons. Differences in the weather conditions between the cassava planting dates resulted in different responses of cassava in terms of forking or branching [3,4].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
