Abstract

Between-individual variation in behavioural phenotype, termed personality, is an important determinant of how populations cope with acute environmental fluctuation related to climate change. Personality in the beadlet sea anemone Actinia equina is linked to genetically distinct morphotypes, which are associated with different heights on the shore. In the intertidal zone, high-shore environments experience more environmental fluctuation due to longer periods of exposure, and animals adapted to live in these environments are predicted to deal more effectively with environmental perturbation than their low-shore counterparts. We collected beadlet anemones of two different morphotypes from three different shore heights. We investigated variation in two behaviours at three different temperatures and in a temporal control treatment where the temperature was not changed: startle response time, the time it took an anemone to re-extend its tentacles after a threatening stimulus, and immersion response time, the time to re-extend tentacles after simulated tidal immersion. These behaviours reflect risk-taking and allow individuals to be categorized as bold, shy or intermediate based upon response times. Both behaviours showed significant changes as the temperature increased. For immersion response, the morphotype associated with the low-shore-lengthened response times at high temperatures. For startle response, all animals lengthened their response times at high temperatures but animals collected from the low-shore lengthened theirs to the greatest degree. At the individual level, although control individuals exhibited temporal changes in their response times, a clear effect of temperature was present in both behaviours. Shy and bold individuals became more intermediate at higher temperatures in immersion response (this effect was present to a lesser degree in control individuals), while intermediate individuals raised their response times at higher temperatures for startle response. Given that prolonged tentacle retraction reduces foraging opportunities and can negatively impact respiratory efficiency, our data suggest that some individuals within a single population of A.equina, particularly those associated with the lower shore, may exhibit less effective behavioural responses to temperature shifts than others. These findings demonstrate that acute temperature changes influence risk-taking, and could have profound short and long-term implications for survival in the face of climate change.

Highlights

  • Anthropogenic climate change is an ever-increasing threat to global biodiversity (IPCC, 2018; Parmesan, 2006)

  • We investigated variation in two behaviours at three different temperatures and in a temporal control treatment where the temperature was not changed: startle response time, the time it took an anemone to re-extend its tentacles after a threatening stimulus, and immersion response time, the time to re-extend tentacles after simulated tidal immersion

  • Temperature interacted with morphotype (F = 16.261,1126, p < 0.001) but not shore height to impact the length of immersion response times (IRTs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anthropogenic climate change is an ever-increasing threat to global biodiversity (IPCC, 2018; Parmesan, 2006). The effects of climate change can be seen in the oceans; since 1971, global average ocean surface temperatures have increased at a rate of 0.11°C per decade (IPCC, 2013), with 2018 having been the hottest year in the oceans since records began (Cheng et al, 2019). Different heights on the shore vary substantially in their exposure to environmental fluctuation (Bockelmann, Bakker, Neuhaus, & Lage, 2002). This leads to highly niche-specialized intertidal flora and fauna, adapted to live at different shore heights and so under differing levels of heterogeneity in their immediate environment (Allcock, Watts, & Thorpe, 1998; Dias, Christofoletti, Kitazawa, & Jenkins, 2018). Phenotypic differences across the gradient of the shore can extend within species, and animals adapted to certain shore heights may be more susceptible to potential environmental changes than others (Brahim et al, 2019; Chapperon et al, 2016)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.