Abstract

The ambient temperature–health relationship is of growing interest as the climate changes. Previous studies have examined the association between ambient temperature and mortality or morbidity, however, there is little literature available on the ambient temperature effects on year of life lost (YLL). Thus, we aimed to quantify the YLL attributable to non-optimum ambient temperature. We obtained data from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017 of 70 counties in Hunan, China. In order to combine the effects of each county, we used YLL rate as a health outcome indicator. The YLL rate was equal to the total YLL divided by the population of each county, and multiplied by 100,000. We estimated the associations between ambient temperature and YLL with a distributed lag non-linear model (DNLM) in a single county, and then pooled them in a multivariate meta-regression. The daily mean YLL rates were 22.62 y/(p·100,000), 10.14 y/(p·100,000) and 2.33 y/(p·100,000) within the study period for non-accidental, cardiovascular, and respiratory disease death. Ambient temperature was responsible for advancing a substantial fraction of YLL, with attributable fractions of 10.73% (4.36–17.09%) and 16.44% (9.09–23.79%) for non-accidental and cardiovascular disease death, respectively. However, the ambient temperature effect was not significantly for respiratory disease death, corresponding to 5.47% (−2.65–13.60%). Most of the YLL burden was caused by a cold temperature than the optimum temperature, with an overall estimate of 10.27% (4.52–16.03%) and 15.94% (8.82–23.05%) for non-accidental and cardiovascular disease death, respectively. Cold and heat temperature-related YLLs were higher in the elderly and females than the young and males. Extreme cold temperature had an effect on all age groups in different kinds of disease-caused death. This study highlights that general preventative measures could be important for moderate temperatures, whereas quick and effective measures should be provided for extreme temperatures.

Highlights

  • The fifth report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated that over the period 1880 to 2012, the global temperature showed a warming of 0.85 ◦ C (0.65 ◦ C to 1.06 ◦ C) [1].The temperature–health relationship is of growing interest after episodes of extreme weather [2]

  • This study highlights that general preventative measures could be important for moderate temperatures, whereas quick and effective measures should be provided for extreme temperatures

  • YLLinindifferent different disease-specific disease-specific populations, we we found that the effects of ambient temperature were significantly associatedwith withthe theincrease increase of of year of life lost (YLL)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The fifth report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated that over the period 1880 to 2012, the global temperature showed a warming of 0.85 ◦ C (0.65 ◦ C to 1.06 ◦ C) [1]. The temperature–health relationship is of growing interest after episodes of extreme weather [2]. Many epidemiological studies have provided evidence for the association between ambient temperature and health outcomes [3,4]. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2699; doi:10.3390/ijerph17082699 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call