Abstract

In-vivo high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has high potential in scaphoid bone pathologies' scientific and clinical fields. The manufacturer's visual grading scale (VGS) classifies motion artifacts and divides scans into five quality grades ranging from grade 1 (good quality) to grade 5 (poor quality). This prospective study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the VGS and the influence of image quality on bone density and microarchitecture parameters for the scaphoid bone. Within one year, twenty-two patients with scaphoid fractures received up to six scans of their fractured and contralateral wrist (each consisting of three stacks) using second-generation HR-pQCT (total 256 scans). Three experienced observers graded each stack following the visual grading system, and inter- and intraobserver variability were assessed. The contralateral uninjured scaphoids were then compared pairwise within each patient to high-quality grade 1 scans to determine the influence of image quality on density and microarchitecture parameters. Inter- and intraobserver variability among the three observers significantly revealed fair to moderate agreement, P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively. Bone volume (BV) fraction tended to increase with poorer image quality but did not exceed four percent. Trabecular bone mineral density (Tb.BMD) decreased with poorer image quality but did not exceed five percent. Trabecular number and trabecular thickness significantly increased by 15.5% and 6.8% at grade five (P<0.001), respectively, and trabecular separation significantly decreased by 13.7% at grade five (P<0.001). This study revealed a considerable influence of motion on bone morphometry parameters of the scaphoid. Therefore, high image quality must be a central point in studies focusing on the histomorphometry of small objects. The high inter- and intraobserver variability limit the VGS. Future research may focus on other grading systems or automated techniques leading to more consistent and reproducible results. Currently, the use of microarchitectural analysis should be limited to cases without motion artefacts or, at most low graded motion artefacts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call