Abstract

IntroductionPress Ganey (PG) scores are used by public entities to gauge the quality of patient care from medical facilities in the United States. Academic health centers (AHCs) are charged with educating the new generation of doctors, but rely heavily on PG scores for their business operation. AHCs need to know what impact medical student involvement has on patient care and their PG scores.PurposeWe sought to identify the impact students have on emergency department (ED) PG scores related to overall visit and the treating physician’s performance.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational cohort study of discharged ED patients who completed PG satisfaction surveys at one academic, and one community-based ED. Outcomes were responses to questions about the overall visit assessment and doctor’s care, measured on a five-point scale. We compared the distribution of responses for each question through proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) stratified by medical student participation. For each question, we constructed a multivariable ordinal logistic regression model including medical student involvement and other independent variables known to affect PG scores.ResultsWe analyzed 2,753 encounters, of which 259 (9.4%) had medical student involvement. For all questions, there were no appreciable differences in patient responses when stratifying by medical student involvement. In regression models, medical student involvement was not associated with PG score for any outcome, including overall rating of care (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% CI [0.90–1.34]) or likelihood of recommending our EDs (OR 1.07, 95% CI [0.86–1.32]). Findings were similar when each ED was analyzed individually.ConclusionWe found that medical student involvement in patient care did not adversely impact ED PG scores in discharged patients. Neither overall scores nor physician-specific scores were impacted. Results were similar at both the academic medical center and the community teaching hospital at our institution.

Highlights

  • Press Ganey (PG) scores are used by public entities to gauge the quality of patient care from medical facilities in the United States

  • There were no appreciable differences in patient responses when stratifying by medical student involvement

  • Medical student involvement was not associated with PG score for any outcome, including overall rating of care or likelihood of recommending our emergency department (ED)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Press Ganey (PG) scores are used by public entities to gauge the quality of patient care from medical facilities in the United States. AHCs need to know what impact medical student involvement has on patient care and their PG scores. Press Ganey (PG) scores are an important marker of quality medical care, used by hospital administrators, healthcare consumers, and payers.[1,2,3] Subsequently, reimbursements are being linked to these measurements.[4] Researchers have identified variables associated with PG scores including interpersonal interactions, patient communication, and perceived wait time.[1,2,3,4] Other factors such as age, race/ethnicity, triage acuity, and arrival time have been suggested to affect PG scores.[1,2,3,4,5]. Similar studies of nonED ambulatory settings have reported positive patient opinions about medical students.[7,8,9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call