Abstract

Objective:Cancer cells exhibit altered local dielectric properties compared to normal cells. These properties are measurable as a difference in electrical conductance using electrical impedance scanning (EIS). EIS is at present not sufficiently accurate for clinical routine despite its technological advantages. To modify the technology and increase its accuracy, the factors that influence precision need to be analysed and identified. While size, depth, localisation and invasiveness affect sensitivity, vascularisation might show an increased conductance and thus might affect specificity.Subjects and Methods:All patients were investigated with EIS (TransScan TS 2000, Migdal Ha Emek, Israel) Planned DCE-MRI prior to histological clarification were included (295 lesions). Dynamic enhancements were assigned scores after analysis of subtracted images after application of Gd-DTPA. D1: strong enhancement of >100% from initial signal obtained on native T1weighted sequence; D2: moderate enhancement 50-100%; D3: enhancement similar to glandular tissue, <50%; D4: subtle or no enhancement, less then surrounding glandular tissue.Results:89/113 malignant and 107/182 benign findings were visible by a focal increased conductance and/or capacitance using EIS (Sensitivity 79%, Specificity 59%). DCE-MRI was aborted due to claustrophobia in 17/295 cases. MR was used and out of 278 completed MR examinations, 101/104 malignant and 141/174 benign lesions were correctly diagnosed as benign or malignant leading to a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 81%. D1 benign lesions were positive in EIS in 33/55 cases suggesting a specificity of 44.4%. This value increases significantly with decreased vascularity to 68.9% (D2-4; 82/119). Out of 60 fibroadenomatous lesions, 10/23 fibroadenomas in class 1 had no focal increased conductance or capacitance and were thus considered as non-suspicious in EIS. The same result was applicable for the 29/37 benign lesions with a D2-4 contrast uptake (43.5% vs. 78.4%, p<.01).Conclusion:Vascularisation influences the measurable conductance at low frequency and therefore partially causes the insufficiently low specificity of EIS. Impedance measurements at frequencies in a range of 0.1 KHz to 1 MHz are required . According to theoretical and in vitro studies this might increase the accuracy of EIS technology. © 2007 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal. All rights reserved.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.