Abstract

PurposeThe goal was to determine whether interactive book reading outcomes for children with developmental language disorder (DLD) were affected by manipulation of dose (i.e., the number of exposures to the target word during a book reading session) and dose frequency (i.e., the number of repeated book reading sessions) and whether pretreatment factors predicted treatment response variation.MethodThirty-four kindergarten children with DLD (aged 5;0–6;2 [years;months]) were taught 1 set of words using the Dose 6 and Dose Frequency 6 format from a prior study (Storkel, Voelmle, et al., 2017) and taught a different set of words using an alternative format, either Dose 4 × Dose Frequency 9 or Dose 9 × Dose Frequency 4, determined through random assignment. Word learning was tracked for each treatment via a definition task prior to, during, and after treatment.ResultsResults showed that children with DLD learned a significant number of words during treatment regardless of the dose and dose frequency format but that significant forgetting of newly learned words occurred in all formats once treatment was withdrawn. Individual differences in word learning were related to Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Core Language and Understanding Spoken Paragraphs scores.ConclusionWhen administered at an adequate intensity, variation in the dose and dose frequency of interactive book reading does not appear to influence word learning by children with DLD. Although interactive book reading continues to show promise as an effective word learning intervention for children with DLD, further development is needed to enhance the effectiveness of this treatment approach.Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9745181

Highlights

  • Because there were two treatment phases (Treatment 1 vs. Treatment 2) with different expectations for change in Set 1 versus Set 2 words in each phase, we examined a piecewise model of change in which the change related to the first treatment phase was described by one linear slope and change related to the second treatment phase (i.e., 2-week post–Treatment 1, 36 exposures in the second treatment, and immediate post–Treatment 2) was described by a second linear slope

  • There was a significant decrease in the log of the number of Set 1 words correctly defined at 36 exposures at the end of Treatment 1 to the immediate post–Treatment 1 test, indicating that children forgot some of the learned words in the interval between the last treatment session and the posttreatment test

  • There was a significant decrease in the log of the number of Set 2 words correctly defined from the last Treatment 2 session to the immediate post–Treatment 2 test, indicating that children forgot some of the learned words in the interval between the last treatment session and the posttreatment test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dose 9 × Dose Frequency 4 results in children accurately defining (on average) 10 words correctly (SD = 4, range: 1–16) at the last treatment session, two words correctly (SD = 2, range: 0–8) at the immediate post, and one word correctly (SD = 1, range: 0–2) at the 2-week post. Turning to the second treatment, Dose 6 × Dose Frequency 6 results in children accurately defining (on average) 10 words correctly (SD = 6, range: 2–19) at the last treatment session, four words correctly (SD = 3, range: 0–9) at the immediate post, and four words correctly (SD = 5, range: 0–11) at the 2-week post. The number of words defined correctly in Dose 6 × Dose Frequency 6 versus Dose 9 × Dose Frequency 4 is relatively similar at 36 exposures (10 vs 10), immediate post (4 vs 2), and 2-week post (4 vs 1)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call