Abstract
A total of 12 human cervical spines were tested in vitro in a biomechanical nondestructive set-up to compare the primary stability of different posterior cervical instrumentations after a bilevel corpectomy. To evaluate the primary 3-dimensional stability with special focus on the impact of cervical pedicle screws. Cervical pedicle screw fixation gains popularity due to supposed higher stability. However, biomechanical studies are rare. Especially the impact of a combination of lateral mass and pedicle screws on stability in multilevel posterior stabilizations has not been evaluated until now. A total of 12 human cervical specimens were loaded with pure moments and unconstrained motion between C4 and C7 was measured. The specimen were tested in the intact state, all lateral mass screws (all LMS) from C4-C7, cervical pedicle screws (CPS) C4 and C7 left, LMS C4-C7 right, C5+C6 left, CPS C4+C7 bilateral, LMS C5+C6, and a anterior-posterior instrumentation (360°). All instrumentations showed a higher stability compared with the intact state. No difference was found for uni- or bilateral applied CPS. The all LMS showed comparable stability than the CPS instrumentations. From a biomechanical primary stability point it seems unnecessary to add CPS in a bilevel corpectomy model. If CPS are added, the unilateral application seems sufficient.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
