Abstract

Cross-sectional radioanatomic study. To introduce a classification system using MRI to describe psoas morphology and examine the position of nearby neurovascular structures. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) offer sagittal malignment correction and reduced morbidity. LLIF has a higher incidence of nerve injuries, while OLIF has a higher incidence of vascular injuries. Measurements were completed on the left psoas at the inferior L4 endplate. Class A was designated if the ventral border of the psoas muscle was >2mm anterior; B if it was ≤ 2mm anterior or posterior to the vertebral body, and C if >2mm posterior to the vertebral body ventral border. Modified oblique corridor, measured as the distance between two lines, one at the medial border of the psoas muscle and the other at the lateral border of the nearest vascular structure, and a preferred LLIF trajectory was projected onto an axial image of the left psoas. If the trajectory violated the posterior third of the psoas, it was considered a dangerous approach due to potential iatrogenic nerve injury. 100 patient MRIs (Class A: 44; Class B: 27; Class C: 29) were analyzed. Average modified oblique corridor was 7.49mm. Modified oblique corridor varied amongst the three types of psoas morphologies (A: 8.99mm vs. B: 8.10mm vs. C: 4.66mm, P=0.040). LLIF trajectory intersected the 'danger zone' in 34.1%, 3.7%, and 0.0% of patients, (P<0.001) respectively. Class A psoas had the largest modified oblique corridor but highest proportion of those with a dangerous LLIF trajectory. Class C psoas had the narrowest modified oblique corridor, but no dangerous LLIF trajectories were identified.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.