Abstract

Virtual reality in a public place is enticing for some yet daunting for others. Social Impact theory proposes that performing in front of larger (vs. smaller) audiences is typically seen as more anxiety provoking and less desirable. Having peers perform with you can offset this, however. Our goal was to test whether Social Impact theory extends to the context of trying virtual reality in a busy public setting, and whether any such effects are influenced by extroversion and trait anxiety. In Experiment 1, we ran an online study with 100 participants and found that images of people trying virtual reality in front of others were indeed rated as more anxiety provoking than images with no audiences. Images with (vs. without) audiences were also rated as scenarios in which people would be less willing to try virtual reality. There was no impact of extroversion levels on people’s reported Willingness to Try; however extroverted individuals were less affected by audience size compared to introverts in terms of how anxiety-provoking they considered the scenario. Experiment 1 also found that the presence of a monitor showing one’s virtual reality “performance” made Extroverts keener to try the experience, yet Introverts less keen. Experiment 2 tested whether the main findings of the first study extended to a real-world scenario. 69 participants observed 0–3 individuals trying a virtual-reality experience in the foyer of a busy library and were then questioned on expected anxiety levels and Willingness to Try. Whilst anxiety levels were again influenced by the audience size (number of people in the foyer at the start of each test), there was no impact of audience size on Willingness to Try virtual reality. Note that relative inattention of the audience on those trying VR in Experiment 2 (compared to Experiment 1), as well as a small sample size, may have made it hard to detect effects here. Extroverts were again less anxious about trying VR in-front of others compared to introverts. These findings offer some ways to make public space virtual reality experiences more accessible, whilst suggesting future steps to properly assess some exploratory findings presented here.

Highlights

  • We are entering what seems to be a second renaissance for virtual reality (VR), with the appearance of affordable, high-quality equipment for home usage (McRoberts, 2018; Slater, 2018; Bennett et al, 2021), and an increasing number of location-based VR attractions (Fink 2018) appearing in tourist hotspots

  • There was support for both the Audience, Q 187.93, p < 0.001, and the Peers hypotheses, Q 7.61, p < 0.01, as indicated by main effects, but these were qualified by a significant interaction, Q 6.50, p < 0.05, such that the effect of peers was only evident in the presence of an audience

  • Multiple moderation analysis linear regressions were run to predict Anxiety and likelihood to try scores based on the factors of ‘Number of VR Peers’, ‘Audience Size’, ‘Extroversion’, and two combinations of measures: ‘Audience Size’ x ‘Extroversion’; and ‘Audience Size’ x ‘Number of VR Peers’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We are entering what seems to be a second renaissance for virtual reality (VR), with the appearance of affordable, high-quality equipment for home usage (McRoberts, 2018; Slater, 2018; Bennett et al, 2021), and an increasing number of location-based VR attractions (Fink 2018) appearing in tourist hotspots. Audience and Appeal of Virtual Reality digital exhibits being thought to help offset declining visitor numbers (Geronikolakis, 2018) Sometimes such VR experiences are done in public places in front of onlookers, raising an important question: does public viewing put people off trying VR? Allen, Kidd and Nieto McAvoy (2020) reported that VR users worry about potential incongruencies between public VR participation and their projected identity, about “looking like a wally” in front of peers and strangers. These suggest that the potential placement and publicness of experiences are significant factors for organisers and developers to plan for. We investigate the extent to which these concerns are present, as well as examining whether there might be ways of countering this potential barrier

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call