Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is currently classified into five different subtypes, from the most severe (type 0) to the mildest (type 4) depending on age at onset, best motor function achieved, and copy number of the SMN2 gene. The two recent approved treatments for SMA patients revolutionized their life quality and perspectives. However, upon treatment with Nusinersen, the most widely administered therapy up to date, a high degree of variability in therapeutic response was observed in adult SMA patients. These data, together with the lack of natural history information and the wide spectrum of disease phenotypes, suggest that further efforts are needed to develop precision medicine approaches for all SMA patients. Here, we compile the current methods for functional evaluation of adult SMA patients treated with Nusinersen. We also present an overview of the known molecular changes underpinning disease heterogeneity. We finally highlight the need for novel techniques, i.e., -omics approaches, to capture phenotypic differences and to understand the biological signature in order to revise the disease classification and device personalized treatments.

Highlights

  • Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting motoneurons (MN) in the brainstem and spinal cord caused by the homozygous mutation of the Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene [1]

  • This section of the review will focus on functional outcomes reported to reliably assess the Nusinersen response in SMA adult patients

  • The discovery of several disease modifier genes, starting with Survival of Motor Neuron 2 (SMN2) [1], and epigenetic factors [92] has revolutionized the traditional classification and account for a wider complexity. This aspect will further change in light of the recently approved therapies that are modifying the course of the disease and increasing patients’ survival

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting motoneurons (MN) in the brainstem and spinal cord caused by the homozygous mutation of the Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene [1]. Treatment with Nusinersen showed very promising results in young type 1 patients [14,15] and some positive effects in type 2 and 3 patients (no type 4 patients have been enrolled in clinical trials to date) [18,19,20] The latter studies which include adult SMA patients (>18 years old) showed that their response to Nusinersen, evaluated as motor function improvement, was highly variable, with 40–50% of responders at best [18,19,20]. An in-depth analysis of both functional outcomes’ evaluation and molecular biomarkers, would help determine the differences that define the wide spectrum of clinical features among SMA patients and their disparate response to treatment Efforts in this direction could lead to the development of personalized medicine approaches in the future

Evaluation of Functional Outcomes in Adult Patients
General Mobility Tests
Revised Upper Limb Module
Quantitative Assessment of Ambulation Capacity
Lung Function Tests
Additional Tests
Genetic and Epigenetic Etiology of Clinical Heterogeneity
SMN2 and Other Genetic Modifiers
C Other modifier genes
Plastin3
PLS3-Interacting Protein CORO1C and CHP1
Molecular Biomarkers
SMN Protein
Neurofilaments
Protein Tau
Serum Creatinine
Perspectives for Personalized Medicine in Neuromuscular Disorders
Conclusions and Discussion
38. ATS statement
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call