Abstract

The question of what community comes to mean has taken on increasing significance in sociological debates and beyond, as an increasingly politicised term and the focus of new theorisations. In this context, it is increasingly necessary to ask what is meant when community is invoked. Building on recent work that positions community as a practice and an ever-present facet of human sociality, this article argues that it is necessary to consider the powerful work that community as an idea does in shaping everyday communal practices, through designating collective space and creating behavioural expectations. To do so, the article draws on participant observation and interviews from a community gardening site in Glasgow that was part of a broader research project investigating the everyday life of communality within growing spaces. This demonstrates the successes but also the difficulties of carving out communal space, and the work done by community organisations to enact it. The article draws on contemporary community theory, but also on ideas from Davina Cooper about the role of ideation in social life. It argues for a conceptual approach to communality that does not situate it as a social form or seek it in everyday practice, but instead considers the vacillation between the ideation and practices of community: illustrated here in a designated community place. In so doing, this approach calls into focus the frictions and boundaries produced in that process, and questions the limits of organisational inclusivity.

Highlights

  • The question of what community comes to mean has taken on an increasing significance in sociological debate and beyond

  • The experience from the Woodlands Community Garden suggests that community as an idea reinforces, curates and creates dissonances within communal practices

  • This suggests that a focus on the relation of communing to community-as-idea is a fruitful way of untangling the complexities of urban collective life

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The question of what community comes to mean has taken on an increasing significance in sociological debate and beyond. With the heightened political focus on local communities as a locus for self-determination, political power and revitalisation, it is critical to Recent theorisations have moved from an understanding of what community is, to seeing it as a form of sociality and action (Blokland, 2017; Studdert & Walkderine, 2016a, 2016b) Building on this insight, this article’s contribution is to demonstrate the power and limits of community as an idea within communal projects in relation to that sociality. Community can be a moral language to justify making people responsible for each other This occurs as funding for community places and projects is cut and the spaces themselves are deemed ‘substitutable’ (Robinson & Sheldon, 2018)

Objectives
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.