Abstract

This paper addresses various problems with the concept of the Icknield Way as a long-distance prehistoric routeway. It argues that the assumptions usually made about the Way's date, origins and whereabouts are in essence erroneous, since they are based upon a complex, if unintended, historiographical myth coupled with a failure to keep up with changing ideas about prehistoric societies. In order to accomplish this, a detailed examination of the origins and development of writing concerning the Icknield Way is followed by an investigation of the evidence for the route, including documentary, archaeological and theoretical approaches.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call