Abstract
Baltic countries have traditionally been treated separately in religious studies and the current approach — to look at Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania as one unit — is exceptional. It is clear that the Baltic countries should not be treated as one entity and for historical, religious, and especially for reasons of different sources, all three areas should be covered separately. But as the methodologies and theoretical approaches have been very similar throughout the history of research, the current approach is justified. This article focuses on archaeological studies, leaving the folk religion from the near past — which is based on oral tradition and which has dominated over the archaeological approach — less represented.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.