Abstract

Researchers widely explored non-intellective study factors because they play a central role in academic performance and are potentially more modifiable than intellective ones. The scientific literature suggests that the non-intellective factors can be classified into three main areas: self-concept, which refers to self-esteem and efficacy, motivation and emotional reactions; the area of study, related to study dedication and operative skills; and the area of relationships, comprising those with family, fellow students and teachers. Basing on these findings, the C-Comp Scale has been developed and tested in the past, addressed to college students. This study aimed to adapt and test a new version of this questionnaire on high school students. Methods. A pilot study was conducted on 364 Italian high school students to adapt and test the new version of the questionnaire, called the H-Comp Scale. The following study, conducted on 792 Italian high school students, provided further evidence of its reliability, structural validity, and concurrent validity with general self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, social self-efficacy, and academic performance. Results. The H-Comp Scale showed to possess excellent reliability and structural and concurrent validity. The final version is composed of twelve subscales, aggregated in three areas, with just 48 items: Study (Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, Time Management, Study Dedication), Self (Learning Assessment, General Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, Reaction to Failures, Emotional Control), and Relationships (Family Relationships, Fellow Student Relationships, Teacher Relationships). Conclusions. The H-Comp Scale would be a useful and easy-to-use instrument to support school counselors, tutors, teachers, and researchers in exploring different types of non-intellective variables, to better project educational intervention aimed to improve high school students’ academic performance and satisfaction.

Highlights

  • The factors that affect the quality of performance of students are numerous [3], which is why identifying the most relevant variables in the quality of academic performance is a very complex and challenging job

  • The current study presents the adaptation of this questionnaire to high school students, given that the literature review suggests the same dimensions as predictors of academic success with this target

  • The distribution was normal for all the items, with skewness ranging from −0.470 to 0.647 and kurtosis ranging from −0.995 to 0.217

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The factors that affect the quality of performance of students are numerous [3], which is why identifying the most relevant variables in the quality of academic performance is a very complex and challenging job. The review of the existent literature previously conducted for the construction of the C-Comp Scale [1] highlighted that the most relevant studies in classifying the non-intellective factors predicting academic performance are by Richardson and colleagues’ [4] and Goodman and colleagues’ [5]. Both publications underlined the complexity of the issue and classified the predictors in (a) personality traits or dimensions, including self-esteem and self-efficacy; (b) motivational factors; (c) selfregulatory abilities; and (d) psychosocial and relational factors. Several studies showed that self-determined behavior is related to many life outcomes and to the quality of life, underlining the importance to support the development of self-determination in different contexts (e.g., educational and work environment) to facilitate the achievement of educational and work goals [7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call