Abstract

The hard sphere model for liquids attempts to capture the physical behavior of a real liquid in a simple conceptual model: a fluid of fixed size spheres that only interact repulsively when they come into contact. Is the model good enough to use for modeling internal planetary structure? To answer this question, I survey variants of hard sphere liquid theory by applying them to the Earth’s outer core to determine which of them explains wavespeeds in the outer core best. The variants explored here are the Carnahan-Starling hard sphere model, the Mansoori-Canfield extension to hard sphere mixtures, the transition metal hard sphere liquid, and the Lennard-Jones hard sphere liquid with attractive forces. With an empirical addition of a temperature dependence to the liquid’s hard sphere diameter, all of the variants explored can replicate wavespeeds in most of the radius range of the outer core. The hard sphere model for liquid transition metals explains the wavespeed best because it yields a mean liquid atomic weight of 48.8 g mol −1 at 10 wt% light element abundance in the core which is in good cosmochemical agreement with core light element models. Other variants also fit core wavespeeds but require implausibly low liquid mean atomic weight implying excessive incorporation of hydrogen or helium in the core. Applied to the detailed wavespeed structure of the Earth’s outermost outer core, the model suggests that the mean atomic weight could be reduced by up to 1.74% or the temperature could be increased by up to 400 K relative to an adiabatic profile, or there could be 8% fewer valence electrons in the liquid.

Highlights

  • According to PREM (Dziewonski and Anderson 1981), the outer core appears to be essentially in a state of adiabatic self-compression, a state representing a convectively wellmixed and chemically homogeneously material

  • Liquid metals are characterized by a bulk fluid of positively charged ionic cores separated from their valence electrons that serve to neutralize the cores’ charges (Hansen and McDonald 2013)

  • As a reference model for the outermost outer core, Tanaka (2007) found that the PREM travel time predictions for SmKS (the family of arrivals that travel through the outer core and reflect m − 1 times from the underside of the core-mantle boundary (CMB)) are the best among more recent radial velocity models, recommending its use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to PREM (Dziewonski and Anderson 1981), the outer core appears to be essentially in a state of adiabatic self-compression, a state representing a convectively wellmixed and chemically homogeneously material. Physicists developed theories to describe fluids at high densities. They recognized that the dominant factors governing the behavior of high-density fluids were the repulsive interactions between the fluid constitutents (atoms or molecular species in the liquid) and the volume that those constitutents occupied in the liquid - the essential ingredients of the van der Waals equation of state for gases. The Earth’s core is not far from this idealization It is a liquid metal comprised of iron alloyed with perhaps 10% by weight of a combination of light elements (Birch 1952, 1964). Stevenson (1980) used hard sphere theory to derive some fairly general properties of the core’s density and wavespeed dependence on depth, and Helffrich (2014) used it to estimate diffusion coefficients in the core

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call