The German Bight: A validation of CryoSat-2 altimeter data in SAR mode

Abstract

The retrieval of the three geophysical parameters – sea surface height above the reference ellipsoid (SSH), significant wave height (SWH) and wind speed at 10m above the sea surface (U10) – is the main goal of satellite altimetry and of primary importance for climate research. The Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) altimetry is expected to provide improved precision and along-track resolution compared to the conventional low-resolution mode (LRM) radar altimetry.CryoSat-2 enables a quantitative comparison of SAR and Pseudo-LRM (PLRM) data derived respectively from a coherent and an incoherent processing of the same SAR echoes. In this paper we perform their cross-validation and validation against in situ and model data to derive precision and accuracy at 1Hz in open ocean, at distances larger than 10km from the coast. The analysis is performed in the German Bight during 2011 and 2012.Both the PLRM and the SAR scheme include waveform zero-padding and identical environmental, geophysical, and atmospheric attenuation corrections. A Look Up Table is additionally used in SAR to correct for approximations of the Point Target Response (PTR) applied in the retracking procedure.The regional cross-validation analysis proves the good consistency between PLRM and SAR data, with no bias and rms differences of 3cm, 21cm, and 0.26m/s for SSH, SWH, and U10, respectively. The precision of SSH and SWH is higher in SAR than in PLRM (by a factor of 2), while the precision of U10 is 1.4 times better in PLRM than in SAR. At 2m waveheight, the SAR precision is 0.9cm for SSH, 6.6cm for SWH. and 5.8cm/s for U10.The in situ analysis shows that SSH and U10 have comparable accuracy in SAR and PLRM, while SWH has a significantly higher accuracy in SAR. With a maximum distance of 20km between altimeter and in situ data, the minimum values obtained for their rms differences are 7cm, 14cm, and 1.3m/s for SAR and 6cm, 29cm, and 1.4m/s for PLRM.