Abstract

Lens induction is a classical developmental model allowing investigation of cell specification, spatiotemporal control of gene expression, as well as how transcription factors are integrated into highly complex gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Pax6 represents a key node in the gene regulatory network governing mammalian lens induction. Meis1 and Meis2 homeoproteins are considered as essential upstream regulators of Pax6 during lens morphogenesis based on their interaction with the ectoderm enhancer (EE) located upstream of Pax6 transcription start site. Despite this generally accepted regulatory pathway, Meis1-, Meis2- and EE-deficient mice have surprisingly mild eye phenotypes at placodal stage of lens development. Here, we show that simultaneous deletion of Meis1 and Meis2 in presumptive lens ectoderm results in arrested lens development in the pre-placodal stage, and neither lens placode nor lens is formed. We found that in the presumptive lens ectoderm of Meis1/Meis2 deficient embryos Pax6 expression is absent. We demonstrate using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) that in addition to EE, Meis homeoproteins bind to a remote, ultraconserved SIMO enhancer of Pax6. We further show, using in vivo gene reporter analyses, that the lens-specific activity of SIMO enhancer is dependent on the presence of three Meis binding sites, phylogenetically conserved from man to zebrafish. Genetic ablation of EE and SIMO enhancers demostrates their requirement for lens induction and uncovers an apparent redundancy at early stages of lens development. These findings identify a genetic requirement for Meis1 and Meis2 during the early steps of mammalian eye development. Moreover, they reveal an apparent robustness in the gene regulatory mechanism whereby two independent "shadow enhancers" maintain critical levels of a dosage-sensitive gene, Pax6, during lens induction.

Highlights

  • Cellular and molecular mechanisms of vertebrate lens development are objects of intense studies for many decades, reviewed in [1]

  • Genetic dissection of lens induction has mainly focused on the function of Pax6, Six3 and Sox2, coupled with studies of BMP, retinoic acid and Wnt signaling in the surface ectoderm, neuroectoderm, and surrounding periocular mesenchyme, reviewed in [1]

  • It was previously shown that specific deletion of Pax6 in the presumptive lens ectoderm (PLE) resulted in a failure of lens development from the lens placode stage onward [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cellular and molecular mechanisms of vertebrate lens development are objects of intense studies for many decades, reviewed in [1]. At the end of neural plate formation, the vertebrate lens originates from the multipotent pre-placodal ectoderm [2, 3] through a series of cell-type specifications, governed by DNA-binding transcription factors Pax, Six and Sox, and including another transitional population of cells, the presumptive lens ectoderm (PLE). Genetic dissection of lens induction has mainly focused on the function of Pax, Six and Sox, coupled with studies of BMP, retinoic acid and Wnt signaling in the surface ectoderm, neuroectoderm, and surrounding periocular mesenchyme, reviewed in [1]. The role of Six and Sox are less clear, it is known these factors play major roles in anterior forebrain development and optic cup formation [10,11,12], further enforcing Pax as an ideal node to decipher genetic wiring of lens induction. Since lens development is sensitive to Pax dosage [4] accurate regulation of Pax expression level during lens development is of great importance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call