Abstract

The argument presented in this article is two-fold. First, it acknowledges that there are multiple interpretations nested within the broad taxonomy of liberal education, Bildung and General Education - Elitist interpretations, radical interpretations, functional interpretations, post-modern interpretations. Secondly, it argues that these multiple interpretations, far from weakening the idea of general education, are evidence of its adaptability, resilience, and therefore, continuing relevance. General education, in all its forms, is needed even more in mass higher education than it was within elite university traditions. It is needed because the Expert and/or Professional Society which grew up in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries been overlaid (if not actually superseded) by new forms of social organisation - the Risk Society, the Informational Society (there are abundance of labels) characterised by novel and volatile configurations of technical skill, symbolic power and social status.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.